<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Urmia University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-1291</Issn>
				<Volume>6</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Researcher and Non-researcher Teachers’ Evaluation of ELT Materials: Converging of Diverging?</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>23</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>38</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">120557</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30466/ijltr.2018.120557</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Brendalyn A.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Manzano</LastName>
<Affiliation>English Department, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Tarlac State University, Tarlac City, Philippines</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-5788-9272</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>ELT materials evaluation is an important professional activity for ELT professionals. However, there are questions on who should perform the evaluation. Although there is a recognized importance of collaboration between researcher and non-researcher-teachers, some scholars have raised their concerns on the possible divergence between these two groups of teachers. Hence, this exploratory study sought to examine whether researcher-teachers (i.e., actively engaged in research) and non-researcher-teachers (i.e., not actively engaged in research) diverge or converge when evaluating ELT materials. The participants in this study involved five non-researcher-teachers and five researcher-teachers who evaluated the sample materials using a two-part questionnaire. These evaluators used an in-depth method because it is more focused and allows them to evaluate materials with depth. The scores assigned during validation were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inter-rater correlations. The findings revealed that the evaluation of the two groups of teachers was consistent in almost all evaluation criteria. However, non-researcher-teachers showed higher agreement among themselves than the researcher-teachers. These findings have implications for materials evaluation and classroom practices.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">ELT materials</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">language teaching</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">materials evaluation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">materials development</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">textbooks</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ijltr.urmia.ac.ir/article_120557_59e9f6c8e34b5c918ecc7d44862c5e7b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
