Bachman, L. F. (2005). Statistical analysis for language assessment. (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667350
Bandura, A., & National Inst of Mental Health. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221129.n6
Bax, S. (2003). CALL – Past, present, and future. System, 31, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4
Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching: Computer-Assisted Language Learning (2nd ed.). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833774
Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public opinion quarterly, 71(2), 287-311. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm006
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Burston, J. (2003). Software selection: A primer on sources and evaluation. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i1.29-40
Chau, J., & Lee, A. (2014). Technology-enhanced language learning (TeLL): An update and a principled framework for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses.Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 40(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/cj.v21i1.29-40
Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524681
Chapelle, C. (2007). Challenges in evaluation of innovation: Observations from technology research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 30-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/illt041.0
Chapelle, C. (2010). The spread of computer-assisted language learning. Language Teaching, 43(1), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809005850
Chen, S. (2016). Language and ecology: A content analysis of Ecolinguistics as an emerging research field. Ampersand, 3(1), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2016.06.002
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/14805-012
Colpaert, J. (2013). Peripatetic considerations on research challenges in CALL. CALICO Journal, 30, 272-279.
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2020). ROAD-MAPPING English medium education in the internationalized university. Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/raei.2021.34.10
Derni, A. (2008). The ecolinguistic paradigm: An integrationist trend in language study. The International Journal of Language Society and Culture, 24, 21-30.
Salkind, N. J. (2007). Questionnaires. In Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (Vol. 0, pp. 809-812). Sage Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952644
Felix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research? ReCALL, 20(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000323
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93 (focus issue), 719-740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00969.x
Hartshorn, K. J., McMurry, B. L., West, R. E., Rich, P., Williams, D. D., & Anderson, (2016). An Evaluation Framework for CALL. Retrieved from https:// dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call10.8
Hilsenroth, M. J., Blagys, M. D., Ackerman, S. J., Bonge, D. R., & Blais, M.A(2005). Measuring psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioural techniques: development of the comparative psychotherapy process scale. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(3), 340–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.10p. 37/0033-3204.42.3.340
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., Kirsh, D., 2000. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human–computer interaction.
ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 7 (2), 174–196.
https://doi.org/10.1145/353485.353487
Hubbard, P., & Colpaert, J. (2019). Toward transdisciplinarity in computer-assisted language learning. calico journal, 36(2), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.37499
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice.
Field methods,
18(1), 3-20.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching.
Foreign language annals,
51(1), 205-218. https://doi:
10.1111/flan.12318
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 4th ed. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2013.511254
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141–165. https://doi: 10.1093/applin/18.2.141
Larsen-Hall, J. (2016). A guide to doing statistics in second Language learning research Using SPSS. (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775661
Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2013). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203708200
Lee, J. S., & Drajati, N. A. (2020). Willingness to communicate in digital and non-digital EFL contexts: Scale development and psychometric testing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 688-707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1588330
Liu, G. Z., Liu, Z. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2011). Developing multidimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites with university students and professors. Computers & Education, 56(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.019
Lobo, R., Petrich, M., & Burns, S. K. (2014). Supporting health promotion practitioners to undertake evaluation for program development. BMC Public Health, 14, 1-8. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/15/1315
Marek, M.W., &Wu,W.-C. V. (2014). Environmental factors affecting computer-assisted language learning success: A complex dynamic systems conceptual model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(6), 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.776969
Mackey, W. F. (2001). The ecology of language shift. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Eds.), The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology, and environment (pp. 67-74). Continuum. ISBN:9780826481733, 0826481736
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044045
McKeown-Ice, R., & Dendinger, R. (2000). Socio-political-cultural foundations of environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598650
McMurry, B. L., Williams, D. D., Rich, P. J., & Hartshorn, K. J. (2016). An Evaluation Framework for CALL. TESL-EJ, 20(2), n2.
Moshagen M (2021). semPower: Power Analyses for SEM_. R package version 1.2.0, https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.950896
Novawan, A., Walker, S. A., & Ikeda, O. (2024). The new face of technology-enhanced language learning (TELL) with artificial intelligence (AI): Teacher perspectives, practices, and challenges. Journal of English in Academic and Professional Communication, 10(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.25047/jeapco.v10i1.4565
Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Psychometric theory. 25 Years Ago, and Now. Educational Researcher, 4(10), 7-21 https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X004010007
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi:10.1002/9780470754887
Piaget, J. (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development. McKay. ISBN: 9780679301639,0679301631
Smith, G. T. (2005). On construct validity: issues of method and measurement. Psychological assessment, 17(4), 396. https://doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.396
Schulze, M. (2017). Complexity approaches to computer-assisted language learning. In S. L. Thorne & P. A. Schneider (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1-12). Springer.
Soleimani, H. (2020). Computer-assisted language learning: Theory and practice. Payame Noor University Press.
Steffensen, S. V., & Fill, A. (2014). Ecolinguistics: the state of the art and future horizons. Language sciences, 41, 6-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.003
Susser, B. (2001). A defense of checklists for courseware evaluation. ReCALL, 13(2), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344001001021a
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. A&C Black. ISBN:9780826459176, 082645917X
Vandewaetere, M., & Desmet, P. (2009). Introducing psychometrical validation of questionnaires in CALL research: The case of measuring attitude towards CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(4), 349-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903186547
Villada, E. G. (2009). CALL evaluation for early foreign language learning: A review of the literature and a framework for evaluation.
CALICO Journal,
26(2), 363-389. https://doi:
10.1558/cj.v26i2.363-389
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 9780674576292
Wang, Y., & Stockwell, G. (2023). Social Justice and Technology in Second Language Education. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 11(3 (Special Issue)), 1-18. doi: 10.30466/ijltr.2023.121403
Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524735
Warschauer, M. (2002). Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i7.967
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6699.001.0001
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technological change and the future of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Brown (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second and foreign language classrooms (pp. 15–25). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610775
Warschauer, M. (2011). Learning in the cloud. Teachers College Press. ISBN: 9780807752494
Zhu, X., Raquel, M., & Aryadoust, V. (2019). Structural equation modeling to predict performance in English proficiency tests. In Quantitative Data Analysis for Language Assessment Volume II (pp. 101-126). Routledge.ISBN:9781315187808